Page 45 - RCOE 22-4

te students. J. Endod. 2004; 30 (12): 863-867.
11. Tzanetakis GN, Lagoudakos TA, Kontakiotis EG. Endodontic treatment of mandibular second premolor with four canals using operating micros- cope. J Endod. 2007; 33(3): 318-321.
12. Ömer M, Görduysus M, Friedman S. Operating microscope improves negotiation of second mesiobuccal canals in maxilary molars. J Endod. 2001; 27 (11): 683-686.
13. Courtinho Fiho T, Cerda RSL, Gurgel Filho ED, Deus GA, Magalhães KM. The influence of the surgical operating microscope in locating the mesio- lingual canal orifice: a laboratory analysis. Braz Oral Res. 2006; 20(1):59-63. 14. Cotton TP, Geisler TM, Holden DT, Schwartz SA, Schindler WG. Endodontic applications of cone beam volumetric tomography. J Endod. 2007; 33: 1121-32.
15. Patel S. New dimensions in endodontic imaging: Part 2. Cone beam computed tomography. Int Endod J. 2009; 42: 463-75.
16. Blattner TC, George N, Lee CC, Kumar V, Yelton CD. Efficacy of cone beam computed tomography as a modality to accurately identify the presence of second mesiobuccal canals in maxillary first and second molars: A pilot study. J Endod. 2010; 36: 867–70.
17. American Association of Endodontists, American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Use of cone beam computed tomography in endodontics Joint Position Statement of the American Association of Endodontists and the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radio- logy. J Endod. 2015; 41(9). 1393-1396.
18 .Setzer FC, Shah S, Kohli M, Karabucak B, Kim S. Outcome of endodon- tic surgery: A meta-analysis of the literature - Part 1: comparison of tra- ditional root- end surgery and endodontic microsurgery. J Endod. 2010; 36: 1757-1765.
19. Setzer FC, Kohli M, Shah S, Karabucak B, Kim S. Outcome of endodon-
tic surgery: A meta-analysis of the literature - Part 2: Comparison of endodontic microsurgical techniques with and without the use of higher magnification. J Endod. 2012; 38: 1-10.
20. Tsesis I, Rosen E, Taschieri S, Telishevsky Strauss Y, Ceresoli V, Del Fabbro M. Outcomes of surgical endodontic treatment performed by a modern technique: an updated meta-analysis of the literature. J Endod. 2013; 39: 332-9.
21. Sempira H, Hartwell G. Frequency of second mesiobuccal canals in maxillary molars as determined by use o fan operating microscope: A clinical study. J Endod. 2000; 26 (11): 673-674.
22. Hess W. The anatomy of the root canals of the teeth of the permanent dentition, Part I. New York: William Wood and Company; 1925.
23. Pineda F, Kuttler Y. Mesiodistal and buccolingual roentgenographic investigation of 7275 root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1972; 33: 101-10
24. Weine FS, Hayami S, Hata G, Toda T. Canal configuration of the mesio- buccal root of the maxillary first molar of a Japanese subpopulation. Int Endod J. 1999;32:79-87.
25.Guo J, Vahidnia A, Sedghizadeh P, Enciso R. Evaluation of root and canal morphology of maxillary permanent first molars in a North American population by cone-beam computed tomography. J Endod. 2014; 40(5): 635-9.
26. Lynne A, Baldassari-Cruz L, Lilly J, Rivera E. The influence of dental operating microscope in locating the mesiolingual canal orifice. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 2002; 93: 190-194.
27. Yoshioka T, Kobayashi C, Suda H. Detection rate of root canal orifices with a microscope. J Endod. 2002; 28 (6): 452-453.
28. Coelho MC, Zuolo M. Orifice locating with a microscope. J Endod. 2000; 26 (9): 532-534.
217 ➤➤
Utilidad del microscopio operatorio dental y el CBCT en la localización del conducto mesiopalatino. A propósito de un caso: Mena-Álvarez J.