Page 21 - RCOE 24-1

ENDODONCIA
82.Wu MK, Wesselink PR. A primary observation on the pre- paration and obturation of oval canals. Int Endod J 2001; 34, 137–41.
83.Nair PN, Henry S, Cano V, Vera J. Microbial status of apical root canal system of human mandibular first molars with pri- mary apical periodontitis after one-visit endodontic treatment. Oral Surg, Oral Med, Oral Pathol, Oral Rad, Endod 2005; 99, 231–52.
84.Wu MK, Dummer PM, Wesselink PR. Consequences of and strategies to deal with residual post-treatment root canal infection. Int Endod J 2006;39, 343–56.
85.Ram Z. Effectiveness of root canal irrigation. Oral Surg, Oral Med, Oral Pathol, Oral Rad, Endod 1977; 44, 306–12.52. 86.Chow TW. Mechanical effectiveness of root canal irrigation. J Endod 1983; 9, 475–9
87.O’Connell MS, Morgan LA, Beeler WJ, Baumgartner JC. A comparative study of smear layer removal using different salts of EDTA. J Endod 2000; 26, 739–43.
88.Goldman M, Kronman JH, Goldman LB, Clausen H, Grady J. New method of irrigation during endodontic treatment. J Endod 1976; 2, 257–60.
89.Grossman LI. Irrigation of root canals. J Am Dent Assoc 1943; 30, 1915–7.
90.Falk KW, Sedgley CM. The influence of preparation size on the mechanical efficacy of root canal irrigation in vitro. J Endod 2005; 31, 742–5.
91.Lertchirakarn V, Palamara JE, Messer HH. Patterns of verti- cal root fracture: factors affecting stress distribution in the root canal. J Endod 2003; 29, 523–8.
92.Sedgley CM, Nagel AC, Hall D, Applegate B. Influence of irrigant needle depth in removing bioluminescent bacteria ino- culated into instrumented root canals using real-time imaging in vitro. Int Endod J 2005;38, 97–104.
93.Abou-Rass M, Piccinino MV. The effectiveness of four clinical irrigation methods on the removal of root canal debris. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1982; 54, 323–8.
94.Tay FR, Gu LS, Schoeffel GJ, et al. Effect of vapor lock on root canal debridement by using a side-vented needle for positive-pressure irrigant delivery. J Endod 2010; 36, 745–50. 95.Vera J, Arias A, Romero M. Dynamic movement of intra- canal gas bubbles during cleaning and shaping procedures: the effect of maintaining apical patency on their presence in the middle and cervical thirds of human root canals-an in vivo study. J Endod 2012; 38, 200–3.
96.Caron G, Nham K, Bronnec F, Machtou P. Effectiveness of different final irrigant activation protocols on smear layer remo- val in curved canals. J Endod 2010; 36: 1361–6.
97. McGill S, Gulabivala K, Mordan N, et al. The efficacy of dynamic irrigation using a commercially available system (RinsEndo) determined by removal of a collagen ’bio-molecular film’ from an ex vivo model. Int Endod J 2008;41, 602–8. 98.Huang TY, Gulabivala K, Ng Y-L. A bio-molecular film ex-vivo model to evaluate the influence of canal dimensions
RCOE, Vol. 24, -
and irrigation variables on the efficacy of irrigation. Int Endod J 2008; 41, 60–71.
99.Wiggins S, Ottino JM. Foundations of chaotic mixing. Philos Transact A Math Phys Eng Sci 2004;362, 937–70. 100.Richman MJ. The use of ultrasonics in root canal therapy and root resection. Journal of Medicine 1957; 12, 12–8 101.Weller RN, Brady JM, Bernier WE. Efficacy of ultrasonic cleaning. J Endod 1980; 6, 740–3.
102.Walmsley AD, Williams AR. Effects of constraint on the oscillatory pattern of endosonic files. J Endod 1989; 15, 189–94. 103.Stock CJR. Current status of the use of ultrasound in endodontics. International Dental Journal 1991; 41, 175–82. 104.Lumley PJ, WalmsleyAD, Walton RE, Rippin JW. Effect of precurving endosonic files on the amount of debris and smear layer remaining in curved root canals. J Endod 1992; 18, 616–9. 105.Weller RN, Brady JM, Bernier WE. Efficacy of ultrasonic cleaning. J Endod 1980; 6, 740–3.
106.Ahmad M, Pitt Ford TR, Crum LA. Ultrasonic debride- ment of root canals: acoustic streaming and its possible role. J Endod 1987; 14, 490–9.
107.Peters OA. Current challenges and concepts in the prepara- tion of root canal systems: a review. J Endod 2004; 30, 559–67. 108.Ahmad M, Pitt Ford ThR, Crum LA. Ultrasonic debride- ment of root canals: an insight into the mechanism involved. J Endod 1987; 13, 93–100.
109.Ahmad M, Pitt Ford TR, Crum LA, Walton AJ. Ultrasonic debridement of root canals: acoustic cavitation and its relevance. J Endod 1988; 14, 486–93.
110.Lumley PJ, Walmsley AD, Laird WRE. Streaming patterns produced around endosonic files. Int Endod J 1991; 24, 290–7. 111.Ahmad M, Roy RA, Kamarudin AG. Observations of acoustic streaming fields around an oscillating ultrasonic file. Endodontics Dental Traumatology 1992; 8, 189–94.
112.Roy RA, Ahmad M, Crum LA.Physical mechanisms governing the hydrodynamic response of an oscillating ultraso- nic file. Int Endod J 1994; 27, 197–207.
113.Krell KV, Johnson RJ, Madison S. Irrigation patterns during ultrasonic canal instrumentation. Part I: K-type files. J Endod 1998; 14, 65–8.
114.Van der Sluis LWM, Versluis M, Wu MK, Wesselink PR. Passive ultrasonic irrigation of the root canal: a review of the literature. Int Endod J 2007; 40:415–26
No. 1, marzo 2019 21 -