Page 19 - RCOE 24-1
P. 19

ENDODONCIA
 11.Mader CL, Baumgartner JC, Peters DD. Scanning electron microscopic investigation of the smeared layer on root canal walls. J Endod 1984; 10, 477–83.
12.Cameron JA. The use of ultrasonics in the removal of the smear layer: a scanning electron microscope study. J Endod 1983; 9, 289–92.
13.Cengiz T, Aktener BO, Piskin B. Effect of dentinal tubule orientation on the removal of smear layer by root canal irrigants. A scanning electron microscopic study. Intl Endod J 1990; 23, 163–71. 14.Aktener BO, Cengiz T, Piskin B. The penetration of smear material into dentinal tubules during instrumentation with surface-active reagents: a scanning electron microscopic study. J Endod 1989 15, 588–90.
15.Cameron JA. The use of ultrasound for the removal of the smear layer. The effect of sodium hypochlorite concentration: SEM study. Aus Dent J 1988; 33, 193–200.
16.Jodaikin A, Austin JC. Smear layer removal with chelating agents after cavity preparation. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1981; 46, 171–4.
17.Czonstkowsky M, Wilson EG, Holstein FA. The smear layer in endodontics. Dental Clinics of North America 1990; 34, 13– 25.
18.Pashley DH. Smear layer: overview of structure and function. Proceedings of the Finnish Dental Society 1992; 88, 215–24. 19.Brännström M, Nordenvall KJ, Glantz PO. The effect of EDTA-containing surface-active solutions on the morpholo- gy of prepared dentin: an in vivo study. J Dent Res 1980; 59, 1127–31.
20.Yamada RS, Armas A, Goldman M, Lin PS.A scanning elec- tron microscopic comparison of a high volume final flush with several irrigating solutions: Part 3. J Endod 1983; 9, 137–42. 21.Pashley DH, Tao L, Boyd L, King GE, Horner JA. Scanning electron microscopy of the substructure of smear layers in human dentine. Archives of Oral Biology 1988; 33, 265–70. 22.Baumgartner JC, Mader CL.A scanning electron microsco- pic evaluation of four root canal irrigation regimens. J Endod 1987; 13, 147–57.
23.Shahravan A, Haghdoost AA, Adl A, Rahimi H, Shadifar F. Effect of smear layer on sealing ability of canal obturation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod 2007; 33, 96–105. 24.Michelich VJ, Schuster GS, Pashley DH. Bacterial penetra- tion of human dentin in vitro. J Dent Res 1980;59:1398–403. 25.Safavi KE, Spangberg LS, Langeland K. Root canal dentinal tubule disinfection. J Endod 1990;16:207–10.
26.Cergneux M, Ciucchi B, Dietschi JM, Holz J. The influence of the smear layer on the sealing ability of canal obturation. Int Endod J 1987; 20, 228–32.
27.Goldberg F, Abramovich A. Analysis of the effect of EDTAC on the dentinal walls of the root canal. J Endod 1977; 3, 101–5.
28.Wayman BE, Kopp WM, Pinero GJ, Lazzari EP. Citric and lactic acids as root canal irrigants in vitro. J Endod 1979; 5, 258–65. 29.Cunningham WT, Martin H.A scanning electron micros- cope evaluation of root canal debridement with the endosonic
RCOE, Vol. 24, -
ultrasonic synergistic system. Oral Surg, Oral Med, Oral Pathol, Oral Rad, Endod 1982; 53, 527–31.
30.George S, Kishen A, Song KP. The role of environmental changes on monospecies biofilm formation on root canal wall by Enterococcus faecalis. J Endod 2005; 31, 867– 72. 31.Brännström M, Nyborg H. Cavity treatment with a micro- bicidal fluoride solution: growth of bacteria and effect on the pulp. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1973; 30, 303–10. 32.Olgart L, Brännström M, Johnson G. Invasion of bacteria into dentinal tubules. Experiments in vivo and in vitro. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 1974; 32, 61–70.
33.Akpata ES, Blechman H.Bacterial invasion of pulpal dentin wall in vitro. J Dent Res 1982; 61, 435–8.
34.Williams S, Goldman M. Penetrability of the smeared layer by a strain of Proteus vulgaris. J Endod 1985; 11, 385–8. 35.Meryon SD, Brook AM. Penetration of dentine by three oral bacteria in vitro and their associated cytotoxicity. Int Endod J 1990; 23, 196–202.
36.Haapasalo M, Ørstavik D. In vitro infection and disinfection of dentinal tubules. J Dent Res 1987; 66, 1375–9.
37.Ørstavik D, Haapasalo M. Disinfection by endodontic irri- gants and dressings of experimentally infected dentinal tubules. Endodontics and Dental Traumatology 1990; 6, 142–9.
38.Lester KS, Boyde A. Scanning electron microscopy of instrumented, irrigated and filled root canals. British Dental Journal 1997; 143, 359–67.
39.Foster KH, Kulild JC, Weller RN.Effect of smear layer removal on the diffusion of calcium hydroxide through radicular dentin. J Endod 1993; 19, 136–40.
40.Oksan T, Aktener BO, Sen BH, Tezel H.The penetration of root canal sealers into dentinal tubules.A scanning electron microscopic study. Int Endod J 1993; 26, 301–5
41.Pashley DH, Depew DD, Galloway SE. Microleakage channels: scanning electron microscopic observation. Operative Dentistry 1989; 14, 68–72.
42.Pashley DH, Depew DD. Effects of the smear layer, Copalite, and oxalate on microleakage. Operative Dentistry 1986; 11, 95–102.
43.Saunders WP, Saunders EM. The effect of smear layer upon the coronal leakage of gutta-percha root fillings and a glass ionomer sealer. Int Endod J 1992; 25, 245–9.
44.Kaufman AY, Greenberg I. Comparative study of the confi- guration and the cleanliness level of root canals prepared with the aid of sodium hypochlorite and bisdequalinium-acetate solutions. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodon Oral Surg, Oral Med, Oral Pathol, Oral Rad, Endod 1986; 62, 191–7.
45.Rubin LM, Skobe Z, Krakow AA, Gron P. The effect of instrumentation and flushing of freshly extracted teeth in endodontic therapy: a scanning electron microscope study. J Endod 1979; 5, 328–35.
46.Goldman M, Goldman LB, Cavaleri R, Bogis J, Lin PS. The efficacy of several endodontic irrigating solutions: a scanning electron microscopic study: Part 2. J Endod 1982; 8, 487–92.
No. 1, marzo 2019 19 -





































































   17   18   19   20   21