Page 27 - RCOE 25-1

ImPlAnTologíA orAl
FIguRA 22 y 23. Encerado en los modelos de estudio en visión frontal y lateral.
3. Kuć J, Sierpińska T, Gołębiewska M. Alveolar ridge atrophy related to facial morphology in edentulous patients. Clin Interv Aging. 2017;12:1481-1494.
4. Hernández-Alfaro F, Sancho-Puchades M, Guijarro- Martínez R. Total reconstruction of the atrophic maxi- lla with intraoral bone grafts andbiomaterials: a pros- pective clinical study with cone beam computed tomographyvalidation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013;28:241-51.
5. Sbordone L, Toti P, Menchini-Fabris G, Sbordone C, Guidetti F. Implant survival in maxillary and mandi- bular osseous onlay grafts and native bone: a 3-year clinical and computerized tomographic follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Jul-Aug;24(4):695-703. PubMed PMID: 19885411.
6. Faot F, Marcello-Machado RM, Hermann C, Fontão FNGK. Splinted wide-short implants in the posterior region of an atrophic mandible opposed by an eden- tulous maxilla: immediate loading and 1-year follow- up. Gen Dent. 2019;67:29-33.
7 . Ravidà A, Barootchi S, Askar H, Suárez-López Del Amo
F, Tavelli L, Wang HL. Long-Term Effectiveness of Extra- Short (≤ 6 mm) Dental Implants: A Systematic Review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019;34:68-84.
8. Amato F. Overcoming Anatomical Limitations: The New Frontier of Implantology. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2018;39:13-15.
9. Anitua E, Alkhraisat MH. Clinical Performance of Short
FIguRA 24,25 y 26. Prótesis terminadas y colocación de las mismas en el paciente. La prótesis recupera la función y permite la higie- ne en la unión gingival con los espacios estratégicamente situados fuera de las zonas estéticas para la higiene.
rcoe, Vol. 25, No. 1, febrero 2020 - 133 -